|
|

Announcing Pre-K Pages Conference for Early
Childhood Educators, July 15th in
Plano, TX
Click here to
register now!
|
|
 |
No
More Letter of the Week!
This page is
dedicated to those who are interested in moving away from LOTW. |
 |
|
  |
|
One of my passions is teaching children how to
identify letters in the most meaningful and fun way that I can. In 2000 I
had the opportunity to review the new Letter People curriculum and I was
appalled at how outdated and non-inclusive it was. While it was the same
curriculum that I was taught with in Kindergarten in the 1970's, it was not
something that I could use in the urban, multicultural setting I was currently
teaching in. On this page I have provided links to articles and other
resources that I feel can best convey the argument for moving away from
outdated letter of the week methods. I have also included some posts from
teachers.net discussion boards. If you see a post that belongs to you and
you would like your name included along with the post please contact me and I
will do so.
I strongly suggest reading the
following articles located in the resources section at the bottom of
this page:
|
|
 
|
 |
What is LOTW? |
It's important that we define LOTW before
we begin examining it. Traditionally LOTW has looked a
lot like this: Each week or so a new letter is introduced.
All of the activities during that time period revolve around the
focus letter; take for example the letter "P", the students might
glue popcorn or other things that start with the letter "P" to an
outline of the letter on paper. The literature read during
this time period might involve things like "pigs", "pancakes", and
"popcorn". There may be a special song for the letter
"P" that the children learn to sing. The students might sample
things like pancakes, peaches, or popcorn. All of this
looks very cute and organized and is extremely popular with teachers
around the world, however it is of vital importance to closely
examine the benefits of this method of teaching, if any, and ask
ourselves if we are really providing our students with the best
education possible.
|
|
 
|
 |
Arguments for Moving Away
From LOTW |
 |
Fluent
letter recognition is one of the (if not THE) predictors of
reading success (Adams, 1990). |
 |
Removing letters from their meaningful context removes the
meaning and purpose from the letter.
|
 |
Children who are taught letters in isolation have difficulty
placing that information into literacy activities (Wood and
McLeMore, 2001). |
 |
It is
more meaningful to introduce letters as they become meaningful
to the students. |
 |
Just
because you and I were taught with the LOTW many years ago does
not mean it is the BEST way to teach letters. Remember the
Virginia Slims saying "We've come a long way baby"? Well,
we have come a long way in education and current research
supports teaching letters in context and not in isolation. |
 |
Teaching with LOTW
slows readers down, yet it's too fast for others, it doesn't
meet the needs of all learners and there is no room for
differentiation.
|
 |
The
students who struggle the most with learning the letters are the
ones who are least helped by teaching letters in isolation. They
need something to help them make connections - isolating letters
doesn't do that. |
|
|
 
|
 |
How Do I Begin to Move Away
From LOTW? |
Moving away from LOTW is much simpler than you may think it is.
You can start by incorporating some of the methods below into your
classroom:
|
|
 
|
|
Resource
My best advice to anybody who is looking
to move away from LOTW is to purchase the following book(s):
Comprehensive Literacy Resource for Preschool Teachers
OR if you teach kindergarten:
Comprehensive Literacy Resource for Kindergarten Teachers |
|
 
|
|
The following are frequent
questions I am asked about moving away from LOTW:
 |
Q: How do
you start teaching your students the letters and sounds in the
very beginning of the year?
|
 |
A: Letters
and sounds are taught in integration. In the beginning of the
year we introduce letters via student names. We talk about our
names as we are getting to know each other, we do lots of name
activities such as the ones on the names page (www.pre-kpages.com/names.html).
We read stories about letters such as Chicka Chicka Boom Boom.
You might also find some useful info on the Welcome to School
theme page:
http://www.pre-kpages.com/schooltheme.html |
 |
Q: Do you
at start with one particular letter?
|
 |
A: No, since
letters and sounds are taught via integration there is no need
to focus on one particular letter (ie Letter of the Week). You
will find that children learn their letters much, much faster
when they are taught via integration vs. isolation. |
 |
Q: When
do you start teaching the letters?
|
 |
A: The first
or second day of school. We read Chicka Chikca Boom Boom and do
several name activities; "getting to know you" types of
activities. Some students may learn a letter or two these first
few days just from that limited exposure. |
 |
Q: I'm worried
that I might not cover all the letters if I don't use LOTW.
How do you know that you have covered all
letters? |
 |
A:
Our district has mandatory
assessments four times per year in Pre-K for report cards,
Language Arts, Math etc. During these assessments we can
clearly see exactly how many letters each student knows. I have
several of my assessments on the following page for download:
http://www.pre-kpages.com/organize.html, you may find them
useful. I keep a clipboard next to my chair with a
spreadsheet of who knows which letters. When choosing letters
for morning message or other literacy activities throughout the
day I refer to the spreadsheet. Many students do not need to
have a letter "covered" in a formal unit to learn it. Some
students learn more quickly than others and they will learn
their letters naturally via integration. For example; some
students may learn a letter the first time they see it (letters
such as "O" and "S" are good examples) just by pointing it out
in a big book or other activity. |
 |
Q: How
do I explain to the parents that I won't be teaching the
alphabet in order? |
 |
A: I would
say the following: "The most current research shows that
teaching letters in
context is a much more effective method than the outdated LOTW
method that they may have been taught when they were in
kindergarten or Pre-K. Just like there have been many
advances in technology in the last fifty years, the same holds
true for education." Then I would hold up my copy of The
Comprehensive Literacy Resource for Preschool
Teachers and say that I would be
happy to sit down and review it with anybody who is interested
it at their convenience :) |
 |
Q: How do you
plan activities and art projects if you aren't teaching LOTW? |
 |
A: I teach
using themes or units, the activities I do are planned around
those themes; you can do a literacy activity with any theme.
Click on the following link to see a complete list of our
themes:
Pre-K
Pages Themes |
 |
Q:
How long does it take for you complete all letters?
|
 |
A: Since
letters are taught via integration there is no time line for
completion, each student learns them at his or her own natural
pace; we are learning about all letters every day all year
long. However, I can give you hard data that may better answer
your question, see the charts below:
|
|
Students |
Beginning of Year
Letters Known |
| 18 |
0 |
| 2 |
10 |
|
|
Students |
End of Year
Letters Known |
|
15 |
52 |
|
5 |
40+ |
|
|
 
|
|
|
|